Discussion:
Albums and Stuff
(too old to reply)
Mike Pierry
2014-05-17 14:35:50 UTC
Permalink
So I'm sure many of you will have read this interview already: http://www.innerviews.org/inner/keneally2.html

The discussion about the waning relevance of the album in popular music made me think about how, in metal, albums still reign supreme. The album also seems to still preoccupy critics at Pitchfork, Stereogum, AV Club, and elsewhere. I know sales have fallen off greatly, mainly due to file-sharing. But still, part of me thinks that, if anything, the downfall of the album has been exaggerated. It still seems like a vital form to me.

An analogous situation might be the novel. While the heyday of the novel has long passed, it's still very much alive and not going anywhere because, as a form, it will always be one of the best ways for an author to create interesting, involving, moving and beautiful works of art. As long as people want to write and read stories, the novel will never die. And I think the same holds true for the album.

To return to music, the bigger problem I see has to do with quantity. There's simply a ridiculous amount of new music being released. And it's all essentially available for free (let's table the discussion about that for now). So for the adventurous consumer of music, it's great but it's also overwhelming.

This is merely an aspect of the same problem with the internet as a whole. There's more content than we know how to comfortably deal with. It's what makes any form of mediation/guidance invaluable. We love lists because they create order, never mind how arbitrary.

For example, one of the more infamously yucky websites on the internet, 4chan, has a music board, /mu, which has crowdsourced a pretty fascinating collection of "essential" album charts for many interesting musical genres, several of which I had never even heard of before: http://4chanmusic.wikia.com/wiki/Essential_Charts

If you already know any of these genres well, you might or might not take issue with some of the choices, but at least it's a starting point for anybody curious about what the hell "brostep" is, for example.

Another interesting thing to me is that the culture of /mu is rich enough to have created its own pseudo-genre, /mu/core, for which there is also a list of essential albums:

http://4chanmusic.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Mucore

You'll note the inclusion of several albums much discussed here. And of course, /mu/core could not help but beget sub-/mu/core:

http://4chanmusic.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Sub-mucore

So in conclusion, the album might be more of a specialty item these days, but it's for the best. As with all great forms of art, it's best appreciated by a fervent minority than a bored majority lured into purchases via over-aggressive marketing.
Hagrinas Mivali
2014-05-19 00:05:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike Pierry
So I'm sure many of you will have read this interview already: http://www.innerviews.org/inner/keneally2.html
The discussion about the waning relevance of the album in popular music made me think about how, in metal, albums still reign supreme. The album also seems to still preoccupy critics at Pitchfork, Stereogum, AV Club, and elsewhere. I know sales have fallen off greatly, mainly due to file-sharing. But still, part of me thinks that, if anything, the downfall of the album has been exaggerated. It still seems like a vital form to me.
An analogous situation might be the novel. While the heyday of the novel has long passed, it's still very much alive and not going anywhere because, as a form, it will always be one of the best ways for an author to create interesting, involving, moving and beautiful works of art. As long as people want to write and read stories, the novel will never die. And I think the same holds true for the album.
To return to music, the bigger problem I see has to do with quantity. There's simply a ridiculous amount of new music being released. And it's all essentially available for free (let's table the discussion about that for now). So for the adventurous consumer of music, it's great but it's also overwhelming.
This is merely an aspect of the same problem with the internet as a whole. There's more content than we know how to comfortably deal with. It's what makes any form of mediation/guidance invaluable. We love lists because they create order, never mind how arbitrary.
For example, one of the more infamously yucky websites on the internet, 4chan, has a music board, /mu, which has crowdsourced a pretty fascinating collection of "essential" album charts for many interesting musical genres, several of which I had never even heard of before: http://4chanmusic.wikia.com/wiki/Essential_Charts
If you already know any of these genres well, you might or might not take issue with some of the choices, but at least it's a starting point for anybody curious about what the hell "brostep" is, for example.
http://4chanmusic.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Mucore
http://4chanmusic.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Sub-mucore
So in conclusion, the album might be more of a specialty item these days, but it's for the best. As with all great forms of art, it's best appreciated by a fervent minority than a bored majority lured into purchases via over-aggressive marketing.
Sharing and downloading singles hasn't replaced albums. It has done
something more analogous to replacing radio. The same people who
listened to the radio song by song and then changed stations when they
didn't like a song were not big into buying albums in the first place.

Selling a million albums was a big deal back when there were only 100
million people in the country, meaning that when 1% of the nation bought
a Beatles album, it was a big deal. It happened because of all the radio
play. And many people bought singles. You couldn't hold somebody's hand
on an album.

By the late 1970s, there was album oriented radio. Stations recognized
that albums were not a mere collection of songs but a cohesive work of
art. Or a bunch of songs that went together somehow. Or a bunch of
pretentious drivel. Regardless, there were stations that shifted their
theme from hit singles to concepts. And there were top 40 stations that
stuck to what was hot, and TV shows that did the same. In the latter
cases, it didn't matter if you liked Willie Nelson or John Denver or
Aretha Franklin. You got exposed to a cross section of everything but
probably bought next to nothing. And people like that who did buy albums
often got frustrated when most of it was "not as good as the hit single."

Ultimately, the goal was to get as many people to listen to your music
as possible, mostly for free, so that when a small percentage bought it,
it was possibly enough to get you rich.

There was also the more pragmatic issue of 45RPM records going away,
albums staying around, and CDs coming out to replace albums. When MP3s
created a better way to distribute singles, it filled a hole as big as
the one that used to be in the middle of 45 RPM records.

These days I suspect that albums will remain relevant for those artists
whose works are bigger than stand alone singles. How many people would
rather pay for three or four Nonkersingles?

Loading...